Immigration Lawyers Blog

On March 19, 2010 through an editorial in The Washington Post, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) presented their four (4) main proposals for comprehensive immigration reform: (1) ending illegal employment through biometric Social Security cards; (2) enhancing border and interior enforcement; (3) managing the flow of future immigration to correspond to economic realities; and (4) creating a tough but fair path toward legalizing the 11 million people currently in the U.S. without authorization. To read the whole article, please visit: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/17/AR2010031703115.html. President Obama issued a recent statement pledging to do everything in his power to forge a bipartisan consensus in 2010 regarding immigration reform. This is a promising statement to immigrants and their practitioners and legislators in light of the desperate need for change in a very broken system.

The USCIS has announced three initiatives to improve the E-Verify system. The first is a new agreement with the Department of Justice that will streamline the decision process in cases of E-Verify misuse and discrimination. The second is an informational telephone hotline for employees and the third is a series of new bilingual training videos focusing on E-Verify procedures and policies, employee rights and employer responsibilities in English and Spanish. For more information, please see: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=70beadd907c67210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=51ee4df6afc67210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD.

This week Senator Kerry (D-MA) and Senator Lugar (R-IN) proposed legislation that would increase job creation and U.S. competitiveness worldwide. The proposed act, known as the StartUp Visa Act of 2010, would help foreign entrepreneurs secure a two-year U.S. visa if they can demonstrate that a qualified U.S. investor will dedicate a minimum of $250,000 to the foreign national's startup venture. Over 160 U.S. venture capitalists have endorsed this proposal. For more information about the Act, please visit http://lugar.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=322460.

The Immigration Policy Center has issued a paper on the Repairing the Broken Employment-Based Immigration System. The paper emphasizes that if the U.S. is going to compete in an ever-changing global marketplace, policymakers need to assess our future employment-based immigration needs. It is critical that they look at both permanent and temporary work visas and high-skilled and low-skilled workers. They must also address the narrow worldwide quotas that prevent otherwise qualified workers from obtaining legal status in the U.S. The paper also states that the country is rapidly falling behind other countries in terms of available labor and talent due to its strict and outdated immigration laws. U.S. employment-based immigration must be viewed as a strategic resource for improving our struggling economy, while also protecting qualified U.S. workers. It is stresses the importance of U.S. lawmakers to embrace the concept of a global marketplace as many other countries already have and help the U.S. regain its stronghold as an economic and innovative leader. For more information, please see http://immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/future-flow-repairing-our-broken-immigration-system.

We previously posted an announcement about the extension of certain immigration programs until 2012. This post is simply a reminder that the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2010, which President Obama signed on October 28, 2009, extends the following immigration programs until September 30, 2012: E-Verify, EB-5 Pilot Program, special immigrant visa category for non-minister religious workers, and the date by which J-1 visitors must obtain that status to qualify for the “Conrad 30” program.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a rule in 2007 setting forth “safe haven” procedures for an employer to complete upon receipt of a Social Security Administration (SSA) “no-match” letter. A “no-match” letter is a letter from the SSA to an employer that a particular employee does not match the SSA database. The DHS rule created the “safe haven” rule that allowed safe haven to employers if they followed a short and harsh timeline for verifying the person’s employment with consequences that could lead to many immigrants being fired. The AFL-CIO and various organizations succeeded in getting a court to stop the rule from going into effect for the time being.

The DHS proposed on August 19, 2009 a rule that cancels its prior “save haven” rule. The DHS is currently accepting public comments on the August 19, 2009 rule until September 18, 2009, after which it will issue the final rule rescinding its “safe haven” procedures.

Please note that the SSA will continue to issue “no-match” letters, but the DHS will not require that “safe haven” procedures be followed. Employers should simply follow the instructions on the SSA letter as presented. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions.

According to a June 25th press release out of Washington DC, President Obama has indicated that he and his administration aim to change the dynamics and tone of the immigration debate. The President, Vice President Biden, and several crucial cabinet members met with Republicans and Democrats from Congress to discuss immigration reform philosophies and solutions, after which the Obama administration released a statement that described the discussion as the “launch” of a new kind of political approach. The President said that the immigration debate has long been characterized by “overheated rhetoric and demagoguery on all sides” and that he intends to set a more responsible course.

President Obama also announced the formation of a high profile working group to consider the problems associated with immigration. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has been tasked to lead this group and to work with Republicans and Democrats in Congress to arrive at practical, non-ideological solutions. A spokesman for the Immigration Policy Center lauded the President’s refocusing of the debate, saying that “the public should be reassured that we are finally moving forward in a genuine bipartisan fashion on comprehensive immigration reform.”

Obviously, it remains to be seen whether the Obama administration’s aggressive push to change the timbre of the debate will bear fruit. But reactions from various camps have thusfar generally been positive. Even ideological opponents of the President’s agenda appeared taken aback by his inclusive approach to problem solving.